east village idiot

intelligent and unintelligible thoughts about life in these five boroughs

Blogging Locally: Can the MSM get this local?

summit.JPGI rarely get serious on here, but I might as well talk a little more about the WNBC NYC Blogger Summit last night (you know, aside from discussing Janice Huff’s extreme patience with a crowd of 150 right behind her).

I’m not nearly as skeptical about the Mainstream Media as a lot of other bloggers are for a couple reasons:

First, my blog doesn’t compete with the Mainstream Media. There’s very little on my blog that you would find appropriate for a local newscast. In fact, there’s very little on my blog you’d find appropriate for the opinion page of a newspaper. Sure, I’ve love to have a venue to be snarky on television, but it just does not compute. The audience is just too niche, and I’m perfectly fine with that. I’ll never really appeal to a mass audience.

Secondly, I’ve worked in the Mainstream Media. You have a lot more appreciation for what goes into a news operation once you’ve worked in a news operation. For example, WNBC mentioned their staff of 22 reporters last night. None of them work 365 days a year. None of them work 24 hours a day. Think about how that nets out. Think about the volume of news there is to cover in New York.  Then think about how many stories get passed on every morning in their daily planning meeting.

That’s what the real challenge that WNBC has, and I think that’s where a cooperative effort with bloggers can take shape: there are too many stories for one compact news organization to cover in a market with 7.4 million households. In New York City, the definition of ”local” is very different than it is in most cities. Historically, Mainstream Media has been responsible for defining what “local” is. Since TV News is the most mass form of local news in the Mainstream Media, WNBC is among those defining what we consider “local.”

Blogging is changing that. What many blogs in New York City consider to be “local” is what the Mainstream Media would consider “hyperlocal.” Gowanus Lounge and Blog Chelsea are great examples. You can’t find this kind of news anywhere else. You won’t read about it in the Daily News, and you won’t watch it on Channel 4. It’s even a stretch for NY1. It’s just too local for a news outlet that has the responsibility of covering Old Bridge, New Jersey and Bridgeport, Connecticut (100 miles apart), and Middletown and Montauk, New York (175 miles apart). Bloggers can truly make local news local. I think WNBC recognizes that, and the fact that they recognized the resources that bloggers can provide is a good first step.

I’m still skeptical that it can work, and there are a lot of challenges that the Mainstream Media will face. WNBC will still have the same audience that they did before they turned to bloggers for help, and no matter what bloggers can bring to the table, a viewer in Morristown, New Jersey probably won’t be interested in the Whole Foods under construction in Red Hook, Brooklyn. The size of WNBC’s on-air and off-air staff will likely still be the same, and the reporters will have the same large workloads with or without bloggers’  help. With these constraints, it’s possible that the first step for WNBC to take when collaborating with bloggers isn’t to make the news more local - it’s to make it more relevant and more interesting.

Getting more people to participate in defining the news of the day will get more people to watch the news.  The ones who are most connected with what goes on in their communities will understand what their communities want to know. Going back to the Whole Foods example: what if a group of citizens in Morristown is concerned about a grocery store being built on a brownfield site there? What if hospital closings in low-income areas of New York City are the start of a statewide trend? What if a hepatitis outbreak on a school hockey team is the result of an overlooked unsanitary condition in many regional hockey rinks? These are stories that might get caught up in the sheer volume of news tips that come from a TV market that takes three hours to drive from end to end.

We don’t want to incite panic and we don’t want to be sensational. Why would we? Blogs don’t have “sweeps” periods. We as bloggers already relay more interesting information to an audience that seeks it.  I think that by providing story ideas that might otherwise be overlooked, bloggers can vastly improve the relevancy of local TV news in New York. Kudos to WNBC for taking that first step, and let’s hope they can follow through.

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 1st, 2007 at 6:49 pm and is filed under Blogging about Blogging. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Blogging Locally: Can the MSM get this local?”

  1. February 2nd, 2007 at 1:57 am

    says:

    “Getting more people to participate in defining the news of the day will get more people to watch the news.”

    Isn’t that what’s essentially going on with blogs? Interest predicated on participation. There are blog communities and clusters, that can serve as local news for whatever they define as “local.” With the internet local needn’t even be geographically based. Then you have the act of participating in the medium generating interest, i.e. a comment on your blog piques your interest. IF the news you receive is dependent on your participation, that changes the dynamics in terms of evaluting what’s important Hyperlocal has hit-or-miss value, right?

    oddly enough, i read this and sort of feel like there’s actually not enough major news in ny to feed networks and ’sphere. I still see most blogs as personal, subjective. Less “news,” more “story.” IF you discount those, it’s essentially the same model.

  2. February 2nd, 2007 at 11:46 pm

    says:

    Chris- I think that in a perfect world you’re probably right. Its funny b/c I also worked in film for years…grew up in it actually …and I did work 16+ hour days and also had to plan and present the kind of thing that Erin did for us…and I just felt like, no matter what the point may be, they jumped the gun in not having any real platform to offer us. Maybe we would have snarked at it anyway, but it would have been a little bit more heartening to have them say at least that they had certain plans for a site that would be dynamic and interesting….and even that different forms of compensation were being considered.
    The thing was to mainly show the boss that we are out here and we are a force…but they seem to have not given him any background, so he seemed like a ding dong.
    It was just so lame…and the truth is that really, the 100 mile gap in the news is easily jumped in chopper 4 or by local affiliates if someone gets shot or burned! The problem is the model. It doesnt challenge anyone beyond the little kid getting run over and the newest sex scandal of a politician.
    If there was something that we could offer, would they even take it and present it as is or would they turn it into the next car chase.
    The news at 5 and 11 is what it is…and I just dont see how anything revolutionary is gonna happen with that lousy bit of preparation that they did. It showed me that they really didnt get it. They want our “scoops,” and they dont even understand that most of what we do wont work for them.
    The bigger blogs, who they were concentrating on, have already polished themselves into proper news soundbytes, and it seemed like it would be easier for them to feature one of those british gals from the loft in soho doing a remote with a large screen monitor like Omar Wasso (is that his name?) and showing a few blogs…whatever…

    Did you…or anyone…have any idea of what they wanted that went beyond a citizen reporter sorta thing?
    I certainly didnt.
    But I like your further post on this. Ive also been thinking about it alot, but havent had time to write anything down today….and I dont know if anything further that I can say means much…because my blog would never have the content that they would want, even though I have celebrity stuff sometimes and lots of political stuff…some of it even first hand and new, if unexciting…I’m just too longwinded and would not be all that interested in losing the texture in favor of the 15 second story (though Im sure that some of my readers would love to lose a bit of the texture in favor of regaining some of the life that we only live once!;-)

    Have a great weekend-

  3. February 4th, 2007 at 1:05 am

    says:

    It is possible that if some people weren’t talking during the entire NBC presentation, we bloggers would have a better of “what they wanted.” Just a hunch.

Leave a Reply